Applying Familar Objects to Regular Obse
Prompt
The MO of many high modernists of the late 20's through the early 50's was to delve into the psychology of individual perception. High modernists argued that everything has many unique ways of being viewed -- and the way it was viewed was up to the viewer and his consciousness with the familiar. Objects with supposedly set perceptions began taking on new forms and the individual psychology was applauded by many famous writers who applied these, then, unconventional methods, including William Faulkner, James Joyce, and Robert Lowell. Even through the confines of limited experience, the author was able to employ these idiosyncratic methods [as seen in Bishop's poem]
Example: Elizabeth Bishop's poem "The Fish,"
... He hung a grunting weight, battered and venerable and homely. Here and there his brown skin hung in strips like ancient wallpaper, and its pattern of darker brown was like wallpaper...
... He was speckled with barnacles, fine rosettes of lime, and infested with tiny white sea-lice, and underneath two or three rags of green weed hung down. While his gills were breathing in the terrible oxygen — the frightening gills, fresh and crisp with blood, that can cut so badly — I thought of the coarse white flesh packed in like feathers, the big bones and the little bones, the dramatic reds and blacks of his shiny entrails, and the pink swim-bladder like a big peony...
Even through the confines of limited experience [all home, or household imagery], the author was able to employ these idiosyncratic methods with much success.
Take 300 or so words to, in any format of your choosing, describe something mundane and apply these familiar-to-individual perception methods. Remember to re-look at different objects and have them take on new exciting forms -- see where your consciousness can take you.
Tags: experience limited
Pieces based on this Prompt:
Driveway
[Write your own Piece based on this prompt.]
|
6-Feb-2007 11:00pm created by ms
Actions: [history]If you find a mistake on this page or if you want to add something, please feel free to use this [edit] link. Use the [history] link if you want to see a list of edits that have been made.
ms
 | posted 12-Feb-2007 1:30pm
I guess no one wants to bite into this one. | bill
 | posted 12-Feb-2007 4:31pm
I'm having trouble understanding it... I'll try again, maybe tomorrow (I'm in a crappy mood right now). | bill
 | posted 13-Feb-2007 2:02pm
Do you think you could try to explain this differently? I think I may be close to understanding it, but I'm still a little unsure.
I think the idea is to take something mundane (like a household object) and try to look at it and describe it using unusual imagery.
So, for example, if I had a red ball in something I was writing that I wanted to describe, my usual tendency would be to use words like: red, bouncy, and rubber. Also, I'd tend to link it emotionally to children playing. But, the point of this exercise would be to eschew all that, and instead try to look at the ball from a completely new and perhaps jarring perspective. Thus, I might compare it to a lizard's eye, a turning gear in a clock, or a hard-boiled egg. And, thus also link it to a wholly different set of emotions.
Am I on the right track? | mccreery
 | posted 13-Feb-2007 2:20pm
That's what I got out of it. But I simply can't find much "creative time" to sit and mull it over. | ms
 | posted 14-Feb-2007 9:35pm
I think you're on the right track. |
Add Comment:
What do you have to say about it?
You must Sign On to add a comment
|